
- A B-School needs to hire the most competent people even though they might not have anyone on the faculty who is in a position to make that judgment. So, they rely on surrogates: does the individual have a PhD? Have they published in respected journals?
- Having a PhD serves as assurance that the holder has been exposed to research methodology and can contribute new “objective” insights.
- This is a push towards “professionalization” within a larger academic community quite like what has happened in other applied fields, such as engineering, medicine and journalism.
It is not the degree that matters but it’s what the degree represents — critical thinking, familiarity with generalizable frameworks, a sense of “where the field of study is” that the teacher needs to have.Is there a different way to learn to manage?Should management be taught in the way a surgeon is taught surgery, where there are often many PhDs involved? Or the way a pilot is taught how to fly an aircraft, where PhDs are rarely seen? Besides having a PhD is no surrogate for the professor’s ability to communicate, engage the students and stoke their curiosity.One challenge to the specialization inherent in a PhD is that problems in business often do not have solutions that can be drawn from a single field. Implementing a new sales incentive system needs to be understood for its financial impact and has to be communicated to the employees effectively. That may need the HR person to work with the finance department, the communication expert and the marketing team to be successful. Most B Schools are still organized around silos – Marketing, Finance, HR, and Communication, which are more reflective of the PhD education process than they are of the integrative needs of a real business.General and yet specificContent that is taught in a B School is now available freely on the Net. The role of professor is less about content transfer and more about making the practitioner curious enough to see patterns among events. So the practitioner has to go beyond their experience and match it with academic research to see how the specific event can be the base for a general model or framework. But then how many practicing mangers have time to read and reflect?Ceteris Paribus – other things being equalEconomists are fond of using the phrase “ceteris paribus” (other things being equal) to explain economic forces. The common man does not have the luxury of keeping the rest of the world static and then watch how two variables will affect the economic forces. Academics have to be able to take general frameworks and theories and make it actionable in the specific scenarios that managers face.Until that happens, I guess we should follow Prof Bill Fischer’s advice, “My sense is that a balanced portfolio of skills would be best — but then the B-School rankings would punish us!”———-Join me on Twitter @AbhijitBhaduriFirst published by People Matters magazine March 2015 <click here>

